Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cem Ilkel vs Joe Tyler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Tyler analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Joe Tyler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 45.99% of points on his second serve, while Tyler has won 44.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tyler has won 50.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.61% and 27.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tyler has saved 48.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40% of matches played (W/L 20/ 30), with Tyler winning 53.57% (W/L 15/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Tyler has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 15/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18), where as Tyler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 15/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Tyler winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Tyler was at the M25 Nottingham, 30-04-2024, First, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Tyler have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Tyler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Tyler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.72 while Tyler has played against players with an average rank of 58.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tyler has won 86% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 41.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tyler has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Tyler
417
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
56% (401-312)
Career Total W/L
51% (52-50)
41% (9-13)
YTD W/L
61% (11-7)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Joe Tyler |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:0 | 1:32:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (38/59) | 75% (46/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (29/38) | 61% (28/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (15/21) | 60% (9/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (24/61) | 25% (15/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Joe Tyler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (9/13) | 61% (11/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (19/29) | 58% (23/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (194/239) | 51% (196/186) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 102 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:22 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.45 | 71.44 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (748/1300) | 70% (395/566) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (527/748) | 60% (236/395) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (257/552) | 44% (76/171) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (37/93) | 43% (18/42) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (452/1257) | 36% (211/587) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 61% (11/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 61% (11/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 14% (7/1) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Joe Tyler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joe Tyler
Player
Mattias Southcombe
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 2-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joe Tyler
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Joe Tyler
84%
(
56 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
2
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aristarkh Safonov
Player
Joe Tyler
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Joe Tyler
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Joe Tyler
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilkel Vs Tyler Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
